I started X.

Attendance management is something that is expected of every company and should be addressed. When asked, "Are you doing it?" it might be more concerning to hear, "Are you doing it correctly?" which could make some responsible parties feel anxious. You may be using time cards for clocking in, but are unsure about overtime calculations. You might be having employees input data into Excel, but how does that stand in terms of legal compliance? You may be managing paid leave on paper, but there’s no room for double-checking. Employee resignations may be ongoing, but could this be due to overwork...? Why not review the various pros and cons of different attendance management methods and revisit the important aspects of attendance management from the "basics"?

We have released a white paper titled "The Common Points of Attendance Issues Highlighted by the Labor Standards Inspection Office." This document provides a clear explanation of the challenges in attendance management that are likely to be pointed out by the Labor Standards Inspection Office, using specific examples. It addresses operational risks commonly seen in many companies, such as attendance aggregation in Excel, timekeeping management through self-reporting, insufficient management of paid leave, and rounding of overtime hours. Additionally, it introduces points that are often highlighted in inspections by the Labor Standards Inspection Office, such as "objective understanding of working hours," "unpaid overtime," "management of the 36 Agreement limits," and "compliance with the obligation to take 5 days of annual leave." This content can serve as an opportunity for companies that think "there have been no problems so far, so it's fine" to review their operations. Companies considering improving the efficiency of attendance management and strengthening compliance are encouraged to take a look. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to let us know.

What do the members of the back office department consider when choosing or replacing a system? If the same product is handled by both a "manufacturer" and a "distributor," how do you feel about it? "Distributor"? Isn't it cheaper to buy directly from the manufacturer? It's obvious that receiving direct service is better, right? ...Is that really the case? In the materials we are releasing this time, we will explain the benefits of "introducing a distributor." Here’s a preview of the materials: 【If you’re going to choose, you should leverage the power of a distributor that handles the ○○ system!】 【Make the distributor your ○○○○○○○ and use them to the fullest!】 Along with these points, we are offering a "Distributor Evaluation Checklist" that will be your strong ally, free of charge! Please make good use of it.

Cutting in metal processing is not just a process of simply dividing materials. It is necessary to choose the appropriate method according to the type and thickness of the material, as well as the required precision, whether it be laser cutting, plasma cutting, or mechanical cutting. Additionally, fine adjustments of conditions during cutting and management of distortion due to heat greatly depend on the experience and skills of the operator. How does high-quality cutting affect subsequent welding, bending processes, and the quality of the final product? For more detailed explanations, please visit the Kando Industrial website! You can find the continuation through the related links.

We are pleased to announce that in the software "INtime for Windows," which enables real-time control on Windows, we are now working on the development and verification for support of AMD CPUs in addition to the Intel CPUs we have traditionally supported. On the following page, we have published performance data and a video titled "The Possibilities of PC-Based Control Created by AMD CPU x INtime RTOS" using PCs equipped with AMD CPUs. We invite you to take a look at this opportunity. https://www.mnc.co.jp/INtime/AMDxINtime/amdxintime.html #RealTimeOS #PCControl #AMDCPU #Ryzen