[Latest Case Studies] Cost Comparison: In-Person vs. Remote
We will thoroughly compare the cost-effectiveness of face-to-face sales and non-face-to-face sales based on the latest case studies provided by "PROBiZZ" and derive the optimal solution.
**Benefits** - Accurately grasp the cost differences between face-to-face and non-face-to-face interactions - Select the optimal sales methods based on data - Reduce unnecessary costs and efficiently achieve results 'PROBiZZ' provides a data foundation that allows for an objective comparison of face-to-face and non-face-to-face sales methods, maximizing cost-effectiveness. Traditional face-to-face sales incur many costs such as transportation fees, travel time, and preparation labor, revealing challenges in efficiency. On the other hand, while non-face-to-face sales are efficient, there are concerns about the "quality of results," leaving companies uncertain in their choices. 'PROBiZZ' visualizes the effectiveness of both face-to-face and non-face-to-face methods based on inside sales performance data, enabling the selection of the optimal sales style according to the situation. Additionally, by analyzing not only cost comparisons but also the processes leading to results, it can improve sales activities from the perspective of "result efficiency," rather than merely focusing on cost reduction. Many companies have adopted 'PROBiZZ,' enhancing cost-effectiveness through the optimization of sales activities and achieving sustainable growth. 'PROBiZZ' becomes a partner in sales reform that simultaneously realizes cost reduction and performance improvement.
- Company:エンジン
- Price:Other