Understanding in 5 Minutes: Cost Comparison of In-Person vs. Non-In-Person

basic information

By introducing "PROBiZZ," you can quantify all costs associated with both face-to-face and non-face-to-face sales channels. You can automatically calculate the burdens of face-to-face sales, such as transportation costs, accommodation expenses, and labor costs, on a per-project basis. Additionally, it is possible to analyze the operating hours and results of non-face-to-face sales using tools like Zoom and Teams. Based on the visualized data, you can easily compare the return on investment for each channel. This enables a channel strategy that increases the number of negotiations and order rates while keeping costs down. For companies running multiple sales initiatives, the analysis provided by "PROBiZZ" clarifies priorities. Sales management decisions can be made more quickly, and the speed of strategic design is also improved. "PROBiZZ" is a data-driven tool that supports sales reform based on cost-effectiveness. 【Strengths and Features】 ■ Automatic comparative analysis of costs and results by channel ■ Real-time visualization features that support sales decisions ■ Design that suggests optimal allocation between face-to-face and non-face-to-face sales

Price information

If you would like to know more about the pricing plans and implementation costs of "PROBiZZ," please take a look at our free materials. We provide a comprehensive introduction to the pricing structure, differences in optional features, and case studies by company size. We also include examples of implementation simulations, providing you with the information needed to consider the optimal plan for your company. Inquiries through the contact form are always welcome.

Delivery Time

Applications/Examples of results

- Company A in the manufacturing industry had high costs for face-to-face sales nationwide, so they used 'PROBiZZ' to compare it with non-face-to-face measures. As a result, they transitioned some of their local negotiations to non-face-to-face, achieving an annual cost reduction of approximately 12 million yen. - Company B, a SaaS startup, had a distribution of sales measures that was dependent on individuals, so they used 'PROBiZZ' to centrally manage the results and costs of each measure. They focused their limited human resources on high-performing non-face-to-face channels, increasing the number of orders by 30%. - Consulting firm C had primarily relied on face-to-face contact for new business development, but they analyzed behavioral data and cost-effectiveness using 'PROBiZZ'. They shifted to a strategy of optimizing channels by target, successfully reducing sales labor by 40% while increasing revenue.