Comparison of Effects Based on Cooling Tower Operating Time [Electromagnetic Water Treatment Device Vol. 8]

Added to bookmarks
Bookmarks list

Bookmark has been removed
Bookmarks list

You can't add any more bookmarks

By registering as a member, you can increase the number of bookmarks you can save and organize them with labels.
Free membership registration

last updated：Nov 08, 2024

日本セルポ

Official site

Comparison of 12-hour and 24-hour full operation! The algae and slime dirt in the cooling tower were treated with Hydroflow.

We would like to introduce a technical case study of the electromagnetic water treatment device "Hydroflow." There was contamination from algae and slime in the cooling tower, which was treated with Hydroflow. This is the condition of clean water during the 12-hour daytime operation. In comparison, other similar cooling towers operated continuously for 24 hours, so we compared the differences based on operating time. In conclusion, it was found that longer operating times resulted in cleaner and more effective outcomes. 【Case Overview】 ■Issues - Contamination from algae and slime in the cooling tower ■Results - A comparison between 12-hour and 24-hour full operation revealed that longer operating times were cleaner and more effective. *For more details, please refer to the PDF document or feel free to contact us.